Podcast 196. Nate and the special snowflake comment

podcast

#1

This is not going to be popular but now that it has been brought to my attention and Ive really had some time to think about it I agree. Also as a customer who gives a crap about this company and product I think I need to share my opinion.

I was at my physiotherapist appointment yesterday morning. He is also a cyclist and triathlon coach as well as the person that put me on to trainer road. He mentioned that he was taking a break from the podcasts and I asked why. He mentioned that he was sick of the Nate show. Seems we always here all these stories from Nate about what he is doing. Most I find interesting to be honest and the ones that I don’t I am sure others find interesting. We discussed it a bit more, and then i dismissed it and went home, hopped on the trainer and started listening to podcast 196.

I couldn’t believe it when I heard Nate’s special snowflake comment. I then started thinking about all the questions Nate has asked guests on the show. One podcast that really sticks out was the questions he had for the specialized crew on aerodynamics for himself and HIS position. There are probably not a lot of 6’ 6" riders on a specialized venge with enve wheels and a stem thats xx and size 14 feet with yellow aero socks and… Those seem like really specific snowflake questions! Really not going to help the majority of your users! I do not fit into your body type.

Lately, the podcasts with amber where he’s asking questions about what HE should do with XX and XX. How many people actually eat 5 bowls of sugary cereal in the morning and are trying to ram down x 100 grams of gels per hour on the bike? I mean you have time with these people off the “air”. Maybe you could ask your special snowflake comments outside the podcast and maybe answer a few more user “snowflake” questions?

I like your stories and tips Nate, but your specific questions about you might be better asked to your guests and Coach Chad off the air. But then its your company and your podcast. But if your going to call a snowflake a snowflake then…

Ill keep listening either way but I don’t know if my PT will be back.


#2


#3

I like those questions.

EDIT: Not sure how much I like “snowflake” as an insult though.


#4

Sometimes those who are learning are the best to learn from as they work through their own questions. Nate asking questions about himself I think he exposes problems in a way the average joe can relate to. I think the balance is healthy.


#5

Perfectly natural to feel angst at this sort of thing. It can become a focus point once brought to your attention and a bit of a bugbear.

That’s fine, everyone’s entitled to their likes and dislikes. I just posted to really say that the snowflake thing says a lot about who you are and where you are mentally in the world today, and it’s really not pretty. Unless you want to align yourself with the far-right and incels etc then I’d probably find another way of expressing myself.


#6

Ridiculous thread.
It’s a podcast - you can skip over any parts you want.
There are tons of cycling podcasts, just listen to something else if you’ve got an issue with this one :man_shrugging:


#7

I learned an enormous amount from the Amber podcasts. Even when it was relating to a particular person, there were clear principles being explained that underpinned the specific examples.

You’re getting bothered about nothing.


#8

Also, it was very clear that the TR crew meant “special snowflake” in the original sense of “unique” rather than the more loaded term suggesting over-sensitivity.


#9

Ive listened to every podcast and for me its part of the ‘show’ hes the the typical TR rider desperately trying to overcome his average cycling genetics seeking every bit of advice and help he can get. I’m sure many listeners appreciate and relate to that even if they sometimes the questions are a bit specific to him, I know I have learned plenty


#10

Ouch.

I believe in the podcast Chad said “Don’t get too special snowflake”, then I said “You can be a little special snow flake, then we can take one step back and pull a wider principal from it.”. Or something like that.

The other thing we talked about is that we need detail.

I watched part of the specialized win tunnel episode again and I’m trying to find things that are directly related to me and not applicable to other people. Can you point some out?

I had one question about my head being above other riders, and I wanted to know if the wake from the people in front of me was big enough that having a higher head position didn’t matter (it did matter).

This might sound like it’s only for tall riders, but it’s really for anyone who has ever been behind someone who is shorter/folded over more than them. I think that’s everyone.

Amber is a big proponent of having people do maximum carb intake on the bike (as long as it doesn’t cause gastric distress). I’ve done this and noticed a huge improvement. I share this because I think people don’t realize they can take in more than they should and it can lead to performance improvements. Jonathan has also shared this recently.

Carb intake before a hard workout has huge science around it, the timing, the amount and the composition of it (fiber/complex/simple/fat content, etc).

I list this stuff because this is what I’m thinking when I’m sharing. I’m sure there are some personal anecdotes that have nothing to do with cycling, but I honestly try to think of things that will be widely applicable to cyclists.


#11

Sure. And even if it was only for tall people, that’s still a common enough thing to warrant being on the podcast. The expectation that everything applies to everyone is ridiculous. So keep doing what you’re doing, it looks like the majority here enjoy it!


#12

Don’t sweat it @Nate

Being 100% honest, sometimes I don’t have too much time to listen to the podcast on my commute, so I’ll skip through the chat about your races (especially when it’s about a discipline I don’t compete in) and get straight to the questions. But when I do have time, I’ll listen to those too as there may still be takeaways in there.


#13

This is what we’re trying to do.


#14

@FatBoySlim I’m able to glean info from @Nate and I am a VERY average cyclist - I don’t race but I do the work for endurance efforts. It’s good information…if you allow yourself to learn and not take offense.


#15

I love the way Nate, Jonathan and Chad talks in the podcast. Everything must not be superserious all the time imo. Please keep being yourselfs, podcast is awesome! Love it.


#16

@Nate, I’ve gotta say, I have an extreme aversion to the term “snowflake” because of the way it’s thrown around in American politics lately.
But when I was listening to the podcast it was obvious that the intent from the comments from Coach Chad and you were addressing what types of questions were considered “good” and therefore answerable by you guys on the Podcast.
They are questions that can be applied to many people rather than addressing a single, specific, unique concern that wouldn’t translate well to the general TR population.
I guess in short, I just want to let you know that I took no offense.
I’m 5 foot 11 and still glean valuable information from the questions you ask regarding your 6’6"frame.
I tend to ride pretty upright, so know all too well about being above the draft, haha.
Keep doing what you’re doing and thanks for a great product. It’s transformed my riding!


#17

I agree. I don’t like re-hashing races, I think it’s boring. I like it when we take out principals from the race and talk about those. Sorry for the Leadville episode!

We’re about to release some go pro footage with in race commentary with Pete analyzing riders. I think you can get some learnings if you’re watching the race footage.


#18

This would be great. I’ve been enjoying the analysis on the NorCal channel so more of that kind of thing out there would be great, especially looking at races at not quite such a high level.


#20

We did three episodes at once. The first one is a little long, but the end analysis by Pete is amazing!

The other two are shorter and have really good takeaways. He points out a ton of bad things I’m doing and I know I’m not the only one doing these, so hopefully you can get some take aways! :joy:

We are using NorCal cyclist as a template for this, we actually had dinner with him last week. He puts out 8-16 minutes of high quality race videos per week. I think we’d all like 2 hours a day of footage like this!

So I hope more people jump on the band wagon and make videos in NorCal’s style.


#21

@Nate I don’t entirely agree, I think its good to know you guys actually do race on the weekend and that analysing a race is good practice, a lot of your listeners I’m sure don’t have years of experiance like some of us